Scientists at Washington University School of Medicine
in St. Louis have shown that
supplementing healthy mice with a natural compound called NMN can compensate
for this loss of energy production, reducing typical signs of aging such as
gradual weight gain, loss of insulin sensitivity and declines in physical
activity. The study appears in the October
27, 2016 issue of the journal Cell
Metabolism. “We have shown a way to slow
the physiologic decline that we see in aging mice,” said Shin-ichiro Imai, MD,
PhD, a professor of developmental biology and of medicine. Imai is working with researchers conducting a
clinical trial to test the safety of NMN in healthy people. The phase 1 trial began earlier this year at
Keio University School of Medicine in Tokyo.
NMN can be given safely to mice and is found naturally in a number of
foods, including broccoli, cabbage, cucumber, edamame and avocado. The new study shows that when NMN is
dissolved in drinking water and given to mice, it appears in the bloodstream in
less than three minutes. Importantly,
the researchers also found that NMN in the blood is quickly converted to NAD in
multiple tissues. Julia Evangelou Strait
Read more at https://source.wustl.edu/2016/10/natural-compound-reduces-signs-aging-healthy-mice/
November 3, 2016 Food
Fight Heats Up as America’s Test Kitchen Sues a Founder by Kim
Severson The owners of America’s Test Kitchen have filed a 39-page lawsuit against
Christopher Kimball, the bow-tied avatar
of New England-flavored American cookery, along with his longtime public
relations consultant, a loyal assistant and the executive producer who is also
his third wife. The complaint says they conspired to
“literally and conceptually rip off” America’s Test Kitchen, the Boston-based
television, radio and publishing empire that Mr. Kimball helped create, in
order to start Christopher Kimball’s Milk Street, their glossy new brand whose magazine debuted this month. There are allegations of stolen customer
lists and trade secrets, sneaky tactics to secure a radio deal and new office
space, and a breach of fiduciary duty on the part of Mr. Kimball, who remains a
limited partner in America’s Test Kitchen.
And yes, there are email servers involved. Much of the suit is based on a forensic search
of emails that it says showed Mr. Kimball’s scrambling to set up his new business
before he left the old one, securing copies of his work contacts and packing up
his belongings. “Want to get ahead of
the partners!” he wrote to his assistant, whose emails show that she used the
America’s Test Kitchen name to search for office space for his new
venture. The suit, filed in Suffolk
County (Mass.) Superior
Court, contends that Mr. Kimball and his team copied the America’s Test
Kitchen style and business model right down to how recipes are written, and did
some of their work on Milk Street while still employed by America’s Test
Kitchen. By 2015, the board of Boston
Common Press, which owns America’s Test Kitchen, had hired a new chief
executive who outranked Mr. Kimball but said he wanted him to stay on in a
leadership role and as the face of America’s Test Kitchen. He could even take time to write books. Mr. Kimball eventually stopped coming to the
office, telling people there he had been fired.
The new venture is named after the street in Boston’s financial district
where Mr. Kimball has rented 8,000 square feet of the ground floor of the Flour
& Grain Exchange building for his offices and studio.
Initially called Milk Street Kitchen, the new venture was sued last
summer by the owner of nearby Milk Street Cafe, who claimed the
original name had hurt his business. Mr.
Kimball won the early rounds of the trademark battle. The lawyer for the cafe owner is now
representing America’s Test Kitchen in the new suit. Although Mr. Kimball has said all along that
he has been careful to present Milk Street as a new endeavor, the suit says
that it is so close to his old one that the public is confused. Even the consumer-driven name of the Facebook fan page for America’s Test Kitchen includes
Milk Street. Read more at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/04/dining/christopher-kimball-americas-test-kitchen-lawsuit.html
November 26, 2013 They
parade it proudly through the campus on football Saturdays, roll it out
during every halftime performance at Ross-Ade Stadium and thump it throughout
each game—the giant percussion instrument that boldly proclaims, right on its
face, that it is the "World's Largest Drum." But is Purdue University's
Big Bass Drum truly the biggest? It
seemed like a simple enough question, and one I got to wondering about recently
while working on a feature about a Purdue research machinist who last summer
spent his time repairing and remaking most of the 216 pieces of custom hardware
on the 92-year-old drum. During my interview with Michael Sherwood, I
casually asked: "How big is this
thing, anyway?" He squirmed at the
question and deferred to the Purdue All-American Marching Band. So I marched over to the Elliott Hall of Music
to find the band's marketing director, Susan Xioufaridou. She promptly spurned my query, insisting the
dimensions of the drum always have been a band secret. Now my reporter DNA was starting to
boil. Nothing makes a journalist more
determined to find a fact than someone trying to keep it under wraps. I scoured the Internet, figuring the drum's
dimensions likely were buried on some obscure blog, as most pieces of trivia
usually are, only to come up empty.
There were lots of estimates for the diameter, but they were decidedly
less than precise, ranging from 8 feet to 10 feet. What I did discover right away was that
there's a lot of competition for the title of "World's Largest Drum,"
which probably explains why Purdue keeps the actual dimensions under its hat,
er, shiny steel helmet. A few drums in
Asia and Europe easily tower over the Boilermakers' drum, with the Guinness
World Record holder in South Korea measuring in at a diameter of 18 feet 2
inches. The University
of Texas has Big Bertha,
which is 8 feet tall and 44 inches wide, and the University
of Missouri boasts Big Mo,
which measures in at 9 feet tall and 4 feet, 6 inches wide. I filed a public records request with Purdue
on Sept. 23, officially seeking the dimensions of the Big Bass Drum. Usually, public records requests take weeks
for a reply. Lucia Anderson, who handles
requests to Purdue under Indiana's Access to Public Records Act, answered
within a day. "I'm responding to
your request for public records as it relates to the 'plans and drawings of the
Purdue Bass Drum . . . " Anderson
wrote. "To the extent that these drawings
exist, this request is denied under IC 5-14-3-4(a)(4) which exempts records
that are 'records containing trade secrets.' " At this point, I was determined not to be
beaten on this story. I sought out
Purdue's resident expert on calculating big things: Steve Wereley, the mechanical engineering
professor who calculated the size of the massive BP Deepwater Horizon oil rig
spill in 2010. Wereley, who presumably
had much better things to do, was good-natured about my odd request, and
accomplished the task in all of 15 minutes.
(He admits it took him a bit longer to figure out the size of the oil
spill, which he accomplished with the help of an expert team and the U.S.
government.) He told me that if he could
find a photo of the drum pictured next to something of known height and width,
he could easily calculate it. A
technique called photogrammetry would take care of the rest. The photo that held the key was one Purdue
itself published in 2008, after a football game against the University of
Oregon. There was the drum, in all its
glory, on the Ross-Ade Stadium football field during an All-American Marching
Band performance. Since the NCAA
establishes uniform guidelines for the size of the markings on a football
field, Wereley said the math was relatively simple. He used the 5-yard line to calculate the
diameter and the field's hash marks to figure out the width. Wereley calculated the drum's diameter to be
7 feet 5 inches. He estimated the width
to be 3 feet 10 inches. While he
couldn't be completely sure of his accuracy, he estimated his calculations were
correct within inches. Even with a
margin for error, that's smaller than the size of the University of Texas and
University of Missouri drums. Purdue's claim to possess the "World's
Largest Drum" was starting to look like what politicians delicately like
to call a "stranger to the truth."
My epiphany came at last. It
turns out that the holy grail of my quest—the true size of Purdue's Big Bass
Drum—was right under my nose the whole time.
City Editor Dave Smith had a hunch that the answer might lie in our own
newspaper archives, stored on microfilm at the Tippecanoe
County Public Library. So we took a
short walk over there. Inside an aging
metal cabinet on the first floor was a square paper boxed labeled
"Lafayette Journal & Courier—No. 474." We gently placed the roll of microfilm in a
nearby reader. Smith quickly scrolled
through the film, slowing down when he reached the 1921 newspapers—the year the
drum was built by Leedy Manufacturing Co.
We glanced through Journal & Courier issues from May, June and July
before coming to Aug. 6, the day after the Big Bass Drum was unveiled. And there were the drum's dimensions, right
on the front page: "Seven feet
three inches in diameter and three feet nine inches wide." Before Purdue decided to designate the
dimensions a "trade secret," the university crowed proudly about the
"mammoth instrument." Hayleigh Colombo http://www.indystar.com/story/news/education/2013/11/24/purdues-worlds-largest-drum-claim-a-giant-exaggeration/3691109/ PUBLIC LIBRARY TO THE RESCUE!
The world's largest drum measures 5.54 m (18 ft 2 in) in diameter is 5.96 m
(19 ft 6 in) tall and weighs 7 tonnes (15,432 lb 5.76 oz) and was created by
Yeong Dong-Gun local government and Seuk Je Lee (all South Korea) in
Simcheon-Meon, South Korea, on 6 July 2011.
The drum is a traditional Korean "CheonGo" drum. See picture at http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/largest-drum
During the final months and weeks leading up to the November 8, 2016 presidential
election, courts across the country have ruled in numerous challenges to state
election laws. For example, there have
been recent court rulings affecting the laws regulating early voting, voter
photo identification (ID) requirements, registration procedures, straight-party
voting, and voter rolls. Accordingly,
many such laws have been recently invalidated, enjoined, or altered. Others continue to be subject to litigation. In Michigan, a court preliminarily enjoined a
2016 law that ended the ability of voters to vote for a political party’s
entire slate of candidates with a single notation—straight-party voting—concluding
that it was likely that the challengers would succeed on the merits of their
claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the Equal Protection
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In
North Carolina, a court invalidated several recent changes to that state’s
election laws, including a voter photo ID law, holding that the laws were
enacted with a racially discriminatory intent in violation of the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Section 2 of the VRA. In Ohio, a court held that a law setting forth
the process for removing the names of inactive voters from the voter rolls
violates the National Voter Registration Act, and in another case, upheld a law
that eliminated a period of early voting and same-day registration, known as
“Golden Week,” against a challenge under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal
Protection Clause and Section 2 of the VRA. Finally, in contrast to the North Carolina
ruling, a court declined to invalidate a Texas voter photo ID law, but required
it to be administered on November 8, 2016, with modifications, holding that the
law has a discriminatory effect on minority voting rights in violation of
Section 2 of the VRA. Read Recent State
Election Law Challenges: In Brief by L. Paige Whitaker, Congressional Research
Service 7-5700 R44675 at http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44675.pdf
From 12:01 a.m. ET on Monday, November 7 until 11:59
p.m. ET on Wednesday, November 9, 2016 anyone will be able to access
NYTimes.com in full, regardless of
whether or not they have a subscription. Along with all of the written coverage that
will appear on the site in those 72 hours, NYT will also be streaming live
on election night starting at 4:30 PM ET on its Facebook page. Plus, the newspaper’s The Run-Up election
podcast will host a call-in show on election day “in which Times politics reporters will answer
questions from listeners.”
Saturday Night Live
GO CUBS GO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GZf0MhCYfs 2:44
http://librariansmuse.blogspot.com Issue 1547
November 7, 2016 On this date in
1665, The London Gazette, the oldest surviving journal, was first published. On this date in 1786, the oldest musical organization
in the United States was founded as the Stoughton Musical
Society.
No comments:
Post a Comment